Peaceful Protesters Lambasted by PAC That Funded Controversial Ad

About 60 people rallied in front of The Herald-Tribune Thursday afternoon to protest an inflammatory ad funded by the Government Is Not God political action committee.

More than 60 protesters — mainly middle-aged and senior citizens — are described as "radicals" and "homosexuals" by a controversial political action committee (PAC) that funded an inflammatory ad in The Herald-Tribune.

The protesters, described as a mob in a news release by Government Is Not God political action committee, were no louder than a competitive bingo game as they stood chatting to media along a sidewalk Thursday afternoon. The protesters said they organized to raise attention to concerns they have about the PAC and its tactics.

Some of the protesters were dressed ineatly n polo shirts and pleated shorts. They held signs with messages that included "Stop The False Ads" and "Bad Judgment Or Stupid."

There was no jostling or blocking passersby, as protesters advised one another to yield to people trying to walk by; they certainly were not the mob as described by the PAC.

Kindra Muntz organized the protest, calling it a "witness" as opposed to a rally, and was less than pleased with the PAC.

"They are morally bankrupt as far as I'm concerned," Muntz said about the PAC. "Whoever is putting this out has no sense. They're not interested in addressing the issues that are really important to American people. They're just trying to stir up hate and anger and fear in religions. It's causing divisiveness in our communities." 

The quarter-page ad in question features Obama and claims saying he will "move America to" force all states to legalize same-sex marriages, have courts accept Sharia Law in domestic disputes, force Christian schools to hire non-Christians, force businesses to give illegal immigrants jobs, among other claims. The Government Is Not God political action committee funded the ad.

"This ad offends Jews, Christians, Muslims, gays, women, the medical community," Muntz said. "I mean, give me a break."

Some members were equally as upset with their hometown paper publishing the ad as they take great pride and ownership of the Pulitzer Prize-winning publication.

"The press has a responsibility to provide fair, accurate information to the electorate," said Donna Cubit-Swoyer of Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections. "Now, I know they need to make money, but selling a page in the paper to distortions like that doesn't help them. … I'm upset with the Herald with the discretion they did not use. That's my hometown paper; I read it everyday."

Ultimately, the situation would be averted if the Citizens United decision would be overturned, she added. The Supreme Court decision allowed unlimited contributions in campaign ads not tied to a candidate. .

Tampa Bay Times' Politifact.com rated each bullet point in the ad, saying most are either false, or the most extreme of falsehoods, "Pants on Fire."

The Herald-Tribune ran an apology in Wednesday's paper stating "that the advertisement did not meet the Herald-Tribune standards for fairness and accuracy and we apologize to our readers for the advertisement appearing in the newspaper."

One protester, Thelma Lemberg, gently tapped a Patch reporter's notebook to inform him that she's canceling her Herald-Tribune subscription.

"Where is truth? Truth? Truth in advertising?" she said. "Ha, ha, ha."

Nom Dumaine of Sarasota hoped the apology would have been more prominent. The apology ran on Page 2A in Wednesday's paper, containing a paragraph, where the advertisement was a quarter page on Page 14A. 

"It seems to me it's a pretty ingenuous apology," he said. "That should have been on the editorial page in big print."

GING Chairman William J. Murray was also disappointed with The Herald-Tribune's apology, though for very different reasons, in a news release posted on the PAC site:

“Sarasota Herald Tribune is responding to the mob the same way that Barack Hussein Obama responded to the Muslim mobs in Libya. After our Ambassador and three other Americans were killed, Obama apologized for the exercise of free speech in America.” Murray said, “Basically, the Sarasota Herald Tribune is apologizing to the radical left mob just as Obama apologized to the radical Islamic mobs.”

No one authorized to comment from The Herald-Tribune made themselves available during the protest, but a reporter was present to write a story on the event.

"I'm concerned going forward that they use a little sense and judgment," Muntz said. "We need sense and sanity in the media, and in politics. You don't need the device hate talk and incendiary rhetoric that causes fear, hate and anger in people." 

The group was not all seniors and middle-aged folk. A couple Occupy Sarasota protesters showed up including Christopher Young, who doesn't support either candidate, coming to talk about eliminating a predominately two-party system. He doesn't think the ad should have been published.

"I do think there's a borderline on free speech when it comes down to hatefulness," Young said. "I don't think that's speech at all. It's hate, and we're trying to get rid of hate."

V. Kater September 28, 2012 at 04:12 PM
The extreme right-wingers like the PAC sponsoring this ad are truly getting desperate watching the surveys moving toward Obama-Biden in a consistent, steady and undeniable way. So, they appeal to their base, i.e., the religious fanatics, the intolerant, the naive, the gullible, the fake patriots, and ultimately the Enablers of the Predatory Plutocrats who would be the only beneficiaries of a, God forbid, Romney-Ryan administration. And of course, there are a bunch of people out there who cannot accept an African American as their president. Racism pure and simple.
R. Hillier September 28, 2012 at 04:21 PM
"Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are "offensive," happens whenever some people succeed in imposing their personal political or moral values on others. Censorship can be carried out by the government as well as private pressure groups. Once you allow the government to censor someone else, you cede to it the power to censor you, or something you like. Censorship is like poison gas: a powerful weapon that can harm you when the wind shifts. Censorship by the government is unconstitutional because freedom of speech is protected in the First Amendment, and is guaranteed to all Americans". The ACLU
sandy September 28, 2012 at 09:17 PM
Great job, Kindra! At least the paper had the good sense to back down and agree not to run these hate ads in the future.
A Whitaker October 01, 2012 at 07:07 PM
R. Hillier--Libel and Slander are just as bad, if not worse, than "censorship". We have freedom of speech, not freedom from reprecussions of that speech. The ad is full of lies...is that how you like it? To win unfairly, through blatant lies that have been easily disproven..as those in this have? Have you NO shame or decency? If you and your ilk want to win this election...win through having the best vision and plan for the country....not through swift boating, lies, and false accusations. And yet this PAC actually has the nerve to have "God" in it's name? Jesus DID say there would be false prophets who would come in his name....this "PAC" has proven to be one of them.
Chili October 02, 2012 at 06:47 PM
People that support this PAC need to be evaluated by a medical progressional and need to attend a course in reality. What an embarrassment!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »